Too much hypocrisy and weird accusations on the timeline - here is my take:
1. I received around 0.75% of the global points distribution daily BEFORE the first @virtuals_io Genesis launch, $HOLLY.
This was simply because I was taking risks and being active in the ecosystem.
I now get around 0.4% of the global points distribution daily AFTER $HOLLY.
This is because people now see the +EV play and are starting to take risks themselves.
Am I crying because my points allocation get diluted?
No I don't.
2. Points are money, and since @virtuals_io never told us the exact formation, we need to "test" the game to find out the optimal way.
Moving funds around is just a strategy to maximize potential points from a wallet's resources.
In gaming terms, it's as simple as farming one camp, then moving to another camp to continue farming.
3. Jeeting bad projects:
Bad projects are heading to zero, sooner or later.
That has been my clear intention as I've stated repeatedly.
There is no point in holding the bag if you have no conviction at all.
This will be my final post regarding this matter. If the $VIRTUAL team feels this approach is unfair to others and decides to change the system, I will respect and follow their changes.
It is their playground after all, and we are simply players within it.




5,907
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

