Too much hypocrisy and weird accusations on the timeline - here is my take: 1. I received around 0.75% of the global points distribution daily BEFORE the first @virtuals_io Genesis launch, $HOLLY. This was simply because I was taking risks and being active in the ecosystem. I now get around 0.4% of the global points distribution daily AFTER $HOLLY. This is because people now see the +EV play and are starting to take risks themselves. Am I crying because my points allocation get diluted? No I don't. 2. Points are money, and since @virtuals_io never told us the exact formation, we need to "test" the game to find out the optimal way. Moving funds around is just a strategy to maximize potential points from a wallet's resources. In gaming terms, it's as simple as farming one camp, then moving to another camp to continue farming. 3. Jeeting bad projects: Bad projects are heading to zero, sooner or later. That has been my clear intention as I've stated repeatedly. There is no point in holding the bag if you have no conviction at all. This will be my final post regarding this matter. If the $VIRTUAL team feels this approach is unfair to others and decides to change the system, I will respect and follow their changes. It is their playground after all, and we are simply players within it.
5,906
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。