Think we've crossed an inflection point in the orderbook vs AMM fight that is very strongly resolving in favor of AMMs Chains like Solana, Sui, and Aptos that are theoretically well set up for onchain CLOBs are utterly dominated by AMMs in volume Successful orderbook launches of the past year is basically just Hyperliquid AFAIK Hyperliquid overcame the liquidity cold start with an off-chain OB/matching engine, and then moved onchain without massive migration (unlike dYdX) to retain that liquidity moat High level, traders and LPs enjoy the liquidity guarantees (and thus volume guarantees) that AMMs offer Launchpads are in favor of the simplicity AMMs give them in seeding liquidity and getting the ball rolling with minimal capital spend If this is a sign of what's to come, I would hope to see a lot more non-meme projects go to market with an onchain-first approach and preserve inventory Pump Fun's success as of now has disillusioned in a lot of people. The perception of onchain markets starts to resemble a row of slot machines But as demand to trade onchain ramps up, I think projects will start to understand the improved cost-benefit ratio of the onchain token GTM over CEXs Orderbooks aren't going anywhere, and I hope we see more onchain CLOBs show up because they are objectively better sources of price discovery than AMMs
11.68萬
2
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。