The last piece of the Starknet scaling buffet is finally here: L3s, battle-tested and production-ready. The latest real-world test by @karnotxyz proved that the L3 building block is now fully ready; both in terms of performance and UX. With a simple mining game (gmine) built as a L3, they achieved: > 400 sustained TPS over 14 hours (smashing the L2Beat record with 220 sustained UOPS over a full day) > Full L2<>L3 UX abstraction: no bridges, no network switching, no new wallets. Players didn’t even realize they were using a new chain. Builders can now create purpose-built environments with maximum scalability and flexibility, without suffering the usual UX nightmares of fragmentation. With this, the Starknet scaling buffet is now complete, offering every option developers need, combining ultra-performance with a web2-like UX. They can build and deploy: > Directly on Starknet L2 for maximum composability > As a Starknet L2 appchain for maximum flexibility > As a Starknet L3 for hyper-scalability and maximum flexibility Scaling without the pain is here, and it’s happening on Starknet.
@karnotxyz learn moar about this Karnot test, and the vision behind it:
GRIDY JUST BROKE THE HIGHEST THROUGHPUT RECORD ON @l2beat Yesterday was a big day. Gridy was more than just a game for Karnot. It was a way to showcase the power of the infra we're building @MadaraStarknet. We crossed 220 sustained TPS for 24 hours, all being ZK proven. To put this into perspective, the next ZK chain that has achieved anything similar (apart from @Starknet which is technically the SN Stack) is ZKSync that's done around ~60 TPS and Linea which has done around ~55 TPS. That's 3-4x lower than what we achieved yesterday as a *startup* and NOT a heavily funded org. The point I am trying to make it that the days of ZK being too expensive or not being scalable are gone. The SN Stack was built for scalability from day one and it's now available open source for everyone to use via Madara and via RaaS providers like Karnot itself. With the upcoming upgrades on Stwo, the SN Stack is expected to be one to two orders of magnitude cheaper (that's 10-100x to be clear) than a lot of other zkVM stacks. The second point I want to drive is the UX issue. Yesterday, we showcased on Gridy that you can use an appchain directly from your Starknet or Ethereum wallet. In fact, users didn't even know it was a chain ( This breaks the misconception that a lot of folks have around building your own chain - users will have to switch networks, bridge funds, deploy wallets etc. Apart from a few times when these concerns are technically valid, most of the times these issues can be bypassed by basic UX and engineering hacks (that do no affect security what so ever). I am more than happy to brainstorm with anyone on how they can potentially simplify UX for their appchain. And the other times when there are technical issues that make app chain UX not so seamless, it's mostly related to bridging back from the chain aka withdrawing. Why is that? Because proving takes time (or you make it fast and super expensive). So, what happens when proving is fast and cheap enough that makes withdrawals seamless too? The UX difference between an app chain and your smart contract app disappears. And the stack that's best positioned to reach that point is THE SN STACK - built ground up with the CairoVM for efficient ZK proving, native account abstraction, proof aggregation and much more. I am not going to say "every app will be it's own chain". I don't think that's true. But apps that should be their own chains and are not because of technical limitations, the time is now and it's possible on the SN Stack (categories where I think an app chain makes sense - A lot of big announcements are brewing for app chains and Starknet in the coming weeks. Stay tuned and launch your app chain with @karnotxyz.
16,64 тыс.
1
Содержание этой страницы предоставляется третьими сторонами. OKX не является автором цитируемых статей и не имеет на них авторских прав, если не указано иное. Материалы предоставляются исключительно в информационных целях и не отражают мнения OKX. Материалы не являются инвестиционным советом и призывом к покупке или продаже цифровых активов. Раздел использует ИИ для создания обзоров и кратких содержаний предоставленных материалов. Обратите внимание, что информация, сгенерированная ИИ, может быть неточной и непоследовательной. Для получения полной информации изучите соответствующую оригинальную статью. OKX не несет ответственности за материалы, содержащиеся на сторонних сайтах. Цифровые активы, в том числе стейблкоины и NFT, подвержены высокому риску, а их стоимость может сильно колебаться. Перед торговлей и покупкой цифровых активов оцените ваше финансовое состояние и принимайте только взвешенные решения.