Neobanks and RWAs will be the bubble of the next cycle. These consumer fintech app, due to branding power, think they can get away without PoR (see crypto[.]com) They will race to the bottom with each taking increasing risks.
Another Difficult Personal Decision We’ve made the difficult personal decision
to stay miles away from every FAKE stablecoins out there and continue trading on @HyperliquidX, where we can literally reverse exposure in minutes with minimal market impact. đŸ€Ł Not because @PacmanBlur, @SmokeyTheBera, or @pauliepunt’s ex–best friend đŸ€Łhave been calling this BS out — but because if most of your assets sit off-chain, you should NOT be called a stablecoin, and you definitely shouldn’t be looping leverage on top of something that is illiquid by definition. @pythianism called it “RWA looping” (conveniently aligned with @hiFramework’s latest investments — we understand it’s easy to sell LPs on a pivot to AI infra during AI-mania kek), but if Buffett called derivatives WMD back in 2008, then looping on illiquid assets with dubious transparency and spreads that clearly can’t outlast on-chain borrow costs is just the tokenized version of WMD. âž» Why D2 Doesn’t Touch That Stuff At D2, we made very conservative design choices since December 2023, and we never marketed our stablecoin-deposit strategy as a “stablecoin.” Even without a single down epoch (yet 🙏💚), calling it that would have been misleading — that’s exactly why we named it ETH++ and now HYPE++, so users wouldn’t get confused. Our triple-audited architecture guarantees that all users can withdraw at the same time, under the same conditions, during the withdrawal/deposit window: This is why even @StreamDefi could withdraw their entire position in one transaction without affecting any other user. (Receipts attached 👇) And — broken clock or not, right twice a day đŸ€Ł — Caleb invested in both d2HYPE and HYPE++, and made money in both. âž» With the Premise (as @GearboxProtocol correctly pointed out) That Looping is Broken
Curious to See How Others Try to Fix It I’m genuinely curious how @sonyasunkim, @3f_romeo, @3FLabs @MikeIppolito_ try to solve this fundamental mismatch, as they discussed on @thebellcurvepod: But when your last hedge-fund employer is — the largest private lender in Asia with $50B AUM — forgive us for being skeptical that it’s “good” to tokenize and loop leverage on private credit, or anything with the liquidity profile of private credit. Private credit is a lawyers-and-paranoid-people game. You negotiate covenants line-by-line, and you need a very specific skillset — the one my ex-colleagues at had. That skillset is nothing like what Vance learned at Framework. Sorry, mate. VC is a home-run business.Private credit is precision-risk management. And definitely completely different than the ‘skill set’ @Re7Labs @MEVCapital @hyperithm @TelosConsilium showed ( or lack of, kek) âž» And One Last Funny Note
 Sonia referenced @FasanaraDigital MF1as an example of illiquid private credit ( we like the flowcharts 💚) The stablecoin that Stream Finance used to repay the loan against MF1? It came from their withdrawal of HYPE++ in one transaction, without any impact on other users. So to anyone exposed to @StreamDefi: you’re welcome. 💚 Hyperliquid
2,46 mil
1
O conteĂșdo desta pĂĄgina Ă© fornecido por terceiros. A menos que especificado de outra forma, a OKX nĂŁo Ă© a autora dos artigos mencionados e nĂŁo reivindica direitos autorais sobre os materiais apresentados. O conteĂșdo tem um propĂłsito meramente informativo e nĂŁo representa as opiniĂ”es da OKX. Ele nĂŁo deve ser interpretado como um endosso ou aconselhamento de investimento de qualquer tipo, nem como uma recomendação para compra ou venda de ativos digitais. Quando a IA generativa Ă© utilizada para criar resumos ou outras informaçÔes, o conteĂșdo gerado pode apresentar imprecisĂ”es ou incoerĂȘncias. Leia o artigo vinculado para mais detalhes e informaçÔes. A OKX nĂŁo se responsabiliza pelo conteĂșdo hospedado em sites de terceiros. Possuir ativos digitais, como stablecoins e NFTs, envolve um risco elevado e pode apresentar flutuaçÔes significativas. VocĂȘ deve ponderar com cuidado se negociar ou manter ativos digitais Ă© adequado para sua condição financeira.