I keep thinking in my head, @anoma finally goes live and I stop having to click through half a dozen screens just to move tokens. That’s the hope, anyway. Based on the public docs and sure, they’re still pre-mainnet, so grain of salt and all that, I picture something like this: • One decision, not a checklist Right now I move from a bridge to a DEX, then double-check gas, then worry I missed something. With Anoma, I’d just need to specify what I want... example: Swap my ETH on Ethereum for USDC on Arbitrum, then deposit it into GMX. Keep it private; lowest cost Submit. Breathe. The solver network does the route-planning • Gas drifts into the background Solvers can fold fees into the quote or even sponsor them. Maybe I never choose which token pays for what. That sounds… simpler • Chains turn into scenery Intents are chain-agnostic. Today the best path might touch Ethereum; tomorrow, Cosmos. I don’t have to care. I just get the asset where I asked for it. • Privacy without toggles Until an intent is matched and ready to settle, it stays encrypted. No extra “private mode” switch, no half-hidden address leak if I forget to click it • MEV redacted Solvers compete to win intents. Part of the upside can leak back to me as a better price, instead of vanishing into bot land. Fingers crossed Will every edge case disappear? Unlikely. Congestion, buggy solvers, UX hiccups; I think those will still be around in one form or the other But if the mental gymnastics drop from six windows to one, that’s already a big step forward.