Neobanks and RWAs will be the bubble of the next cycle. These consumer fintech app, due to branding power, think they can get away without PoR (see crypto[.]com) They will race to the bottom with each taking increasing risks.
Another Difficult Personal Decision We’ve made the difficult personal decision…to stay miles away from every FAKE stablecoins out there and continue trading on @HyperliquidX, where we can literally reverse exposure in minutes with minimal market impact. 🤣 Not because @PacmanBlur, @SmokeyTheBera, or @pauliepunt’s ex–best friend 🤣have been calling this BS out — but because if most of your assets sit off-chain, you should NOT be called a stablecoin, and you definitely shouldn’t be looping leverage on top of something that is illiquid by definition. @pythianism called it “RWA looping” (conveniently aligned with @hiFramework’s latest investments — we understand it’s easy to sell LPs on a pivot to AI infra during AI-mania kek), but if Buffett called derivatives WMD back in 2008, then looping on illiquid assets with dubious transparency and spreads that clearly can’t outlast on-chain borrow costs is just the tokenized version of WMD. ⸻ Why D2 Doesn’t Touch That Stuff At D2, we made very conservative design choices since December 2023, and we never marketed our stablecoin-deposit strategy as a “stablecoin.” Even without a single down epoch (yet 🙏💚), calling it that would have been misleading — that’s exactly why we named it ETH++ and now HYPE++, so users wouldn’t get confused. Our triple-audited architecture guarantees that all users can withdraw at the same time, under the same conditions, during the withdrawal/deposit window: This is why even @StreamDefi could withdraw their entire position in one transaction without affecting any other user. (Receipts attached 👇) And — broken clock or not, right twice a day 🤣 — Caleb invested in both d2HYPE and HYPE++, and made money in both. ⸻ With the Premise (as @GearboxProtocol correctly pointed out) That Looping is Broken…Curious to See How Others Try to Fix It I’m genuinely curious how @sonyasunkim, @3f_romeo, @3FLabs @MikeIppolito_ try to solve this fundamental mismatch, as they discussed on @thebellcurvepod: But when your last hedge-fund employer is — the largest private lender in Asia with $50B AUM — forgive us for being skeptical that it’s “good” to tokenize and loop leverage on private credit, or anything with the liquidity profile of private credit. Private credit is a lawyers-and-paranoid-people game. You negotiate covenants line-by-line, and you need a very specific skillset — the one my ex-colleagues at had. That skillset is nothing like what Vance learned at Framework. Sorry, mate. VC is a home-run business.Private credit is precision-risk management. And definitely completely different than the ‘skill set’ @Re7Labs @MEVCapital @hyperithm @TelosConsilium showed ( or lack of, kek) ⸻ And One Last Funny Note… Sonia referenced @FasanaraDigital MF1as an example of illiquid private credit ( we like the flowcharts 💚) The stablecoin that Stream Finance used to repay the loan against MF1? It came from their withdrawal of HYPE++ in one transaction, without any impact on other users. So to anyone exposed to @StreamDefi: you’re welcome. 💚 Hyperliquid
2,455
1
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。