rollups are distribution.
and Ethereum delegated distribution to them, like it or not.
as a builder I don't chat with EF, I do BD with L2s and I pick the one that I believe will maximize my likelihood of success.
it's not about tech when it comes to rollups.
It's actually the opposite
This is a screenshot from a tweet from a rollup founder.
Rollups need to stop thinking that their tech differentiates them.
None of your tech is 10x your competitors, sorry. None of you. Not even close. We're talking percentage differences, not magnitudes. None of you are even trustless yet.
Ethereum doesn't have a BD team. Which means that we have 42 BD rollup teams that go talk to institutions and governments, and none close the sale because they all muddle each other's messages. The whole process sours some institutions on Ethereum even when ETH is obviously the best choice for them.
Startups and tech generally have traditionally underrated marketing. "The product should sell itself."
Ethereum is even worse about this. Vitalik is culpable for overrating tech and tinkering with the protocol rather than doing the hard work of figuring out distribution.
Ethereum needs to focus on winning. Real apps for real users.
2,902
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。