What to ape on @virtual_io Genesis.
We have two launches today: one is @BAD__AI, another is @Vruff_
Let's analyze both.
1. $BADAI
Let's keep it short: This looks like another $PLAY, lmao.
- New X profile
- No Dev X profile
- Popped up from nowhere
Better stay away, not worth the risk.
2. $VRUFF
Overview: This is a second project from @_Virtu_ai team, their first token is $VIRTU, trading at 550k market cap.
A. What I like:
- The team is well-known in the @virtual_io ecosystem, which means the risk of rugging is low, or probably close to 0.
- $VIRTUAL is pumping hard, and Genesis is also getting CT attention. So we may see some bids when the token launches.
B. What I DON'T like:
- A secondary token means it is limited to the ceiling of the first token (550k market cap).
- This looks like a simple meme token to reward the current $VIRTU holders.
- In the last two launches, all points were refunded to users, meaning there are too many points in the system right now, which can create a very high point/$VIRTUAL allocation ratio.
For example, you may need 200k points to get max allocation.
Conclusion:
- $BADAI: Stay away.
- $VRUFF: Very low risk, but potentially low reward as well. So allocating your Virgen Points wisely.
Personally I would spend 25% points on this launch.




934
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

