The challenge with Ethereum’s economics today is that $ETH is losing ground on two fronts currently Ultrasound Money (Revenue): L1 revenue has been deteriorating due to Ethereum forfeiting the most valuable part of the stack (congestion gas pricing fees + MEV) to L2s, while optimizing for the least valuable part of the stack (settlement + DA), as seen in the 90%+ profit margins of L2s In parallel, applications are increasingly recapturing their own MEV rather than letting it leak to L1 blockchain validators (e.g., Aave using Chainlink SVR to recapture liquidation MEV + apps launching their own app chains / L2s like Uniswap) As Ethereum continues to scale blobspace for L2s and scale the L1, transaction fees become a race to the bottom in terms of marginal cost, while apps continue to capture more of the revenue pie Ethereum doesn’t exist in isolation, it has to compete with other alt L1s (and L2s) on speed and cost, which push down revenue if demand doesn’t scale up as well, at least for the foreseeable future Ethereum needs absolutely insane amounts of onchain volume/activity for its economics to make sense in terms of revenue at scale, or get back to where it was in 2021, and how much will L2s and apps make in comparison in that world? Programmable Money (SoV): Gas tokens are being abstracted away in the background via account abstraction and paymaster solutions, any form of value can be used to pay for any services (incl gas), nobody will need to hold surplus reserves of ETH for gas on any network or even know the asset exists L2s don’t just scale access to ETH, they scale access to every asset issued on Ethereum, ETH therefore has to compete with every other form of value on its network And by bridging ETH to a trusted/centralized L2, that ETH ends up having the same exact trust assumptions as every other assets bridged over, negating much of its ‘censorship-resistant SoV’ advantages USD Stablecoins have been the clear PMF of crypto and more and more crypto markets these days are denominated in USD, it won’t be any different when tokenized assets scale up as people want to trade against the world reserve currency The world hasn’t changed, people don’t want to use a highly volatile cryptocurrency for day-to-day payments unless they absolutely have to, stablecoins offer a better UX and more stability for 99% of people The best argument ETH has for this is that it’s unironically the second best crypto asset SoV, so you should diversify into it after buying BTC, not the best argument imo That or Ethereum is able to successfully pivot to recapture a better share of the revenue pie back from L2s (e.g., based rollups), and/or have a really good ‘ETH is money’ psyops campaign Nothing is guaranteed to work, it’s really up to you how optimistic you are on how Ethereum’s pivot will play out Either way, a few years ago, neither of these forms of value accrual were in question, but now they are And when you’re a rank #2 $210B asset just after BTC, yes you are held to higher standards than other cryptos, with current metrics compared to historical metrics to measure growth
@0xSton And that unique value to L2s, DA blobs, unfortunately just isn’t that valuable today The economics of DA generally is pretty bad, increasingly commoditized and flat fee pricing (value of a blob doesn’t scale with the economic value of transactions it contains)
$ETH economics look bleak, here's some numbers from the past year L2 networks generated ~10x more profit than Ethereum L1 generated in blob fees L2 networks had an average 80.7% profit margin ($139M in revenue - $28.6M in L1 costs = $110.4M in L2 profits) Ethereum L1 made only $12M in blobs fees from L2s (~$16.6M in settlement fees) @base was the most profitable L2, with a profit margin of 93.9% ($80.4M revenue - $5.2M L1 costs = $75.2M profit), accounting for 68% of all L2 profits Ethereum L1 charged $16.53/MB for DA blobs (708GB for $12M in fees from 31 protocols) While @celestia charged only $0.09/MB for DA blobs (2.53TB for $234K in fees from 22 protocols) In effect, Alt DA was 180x cheaper than Ethereum L1 blobs Obviously these are all backward facing numbers, and the future could look completely different But these L2 margins are not looking favorable for the L1 and altDA will only continue to get more competitive
@Cryptovalley__ I did, and these were the conclusions, which included looking at the data
$ETH economics look bleak, here's some numbers from the past year L2 networks generated ~10x more profit than Ethereum L1 generated in blob fees L2 networks had an average 80.7% profit margin ($139M in revenue - $28.6M in L1 costs = $110.4M in L2 profits) Ethereum L1 made only $12M in blobs fees from L2s (~$16.6M in settlement fees) @base was the most profitable L2, with a profit margin of 93.9% ($80.4M revenue - $5.2M L1 costs = $75.2M profit), accounting for 68% of all L2 profits Ethereum L1 charged $16.53/MB for DA blobs (708GB for $12M in fees from 31 protocols) While @celestia charged only $0.09/MB for DA blobs (2.53TB for $234K in fees from 22 protocols) In effect, Alt DA was 180x cheaper than Ethereum L1 blobs Obviously these are all backward facing numbers, and the future could look completely different But these L2 margins are not looking favorable for the L1 and altDA will only continue to get more competitive
2,150
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。