The good old $AMPL, such posts make me feel old 😁
Amazing how many once hot & high potential crypto experiments failed.
Just a few on my list:
- Fractional NFTs / ERC-404
- NFT lending
- Music NFTs
- Elastic supply tokens/stablecoins (although $AMPL still alive)
- $YFI style 'fair launches'
- (3,3)
- Move-to-Earn (and similar Earn slogans)
- Two-token model (Bera might be last to try it)
- Algo-stablecoins (UST but sUSD depegged despite 750% col. ratio)
- "Stable asset" controlled by interest rates, not pegged to fiat: $RAI
- Stables backed by Protocol controlled value (PCV) like $FEI.
(Olimpus DAO keeps similar Protocol Owned Liquidity (POL) idea alive.)
Failure is part of innovation. And crypto is amazing as we experiment a lot.
Perhaps those ideas were ahead of their time, like YouTube was before adequate internet speeds.
Still, I feel innovation in tokenomics and demand for complex mechanics have declined. The UST collapse gave us PTSD.
Experimentation still exists. e.g.:
- Berachain's Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) -> Chain-Owned Liquidity (COL)
- Intia's Enshrined liquidity
- Internet Capital Markets
- Memecoin launchpads: Boop, pumpfun
- L2s
Remember that experimentation is great but don't marry your bags and the latest hot trend will likely fade away.
1.75万
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。


