10 key insights from @BinanceResearch’s June 2025 report on the evolution of token models. Tap & hold to load infographic summary in 4K.
#2. Governance as token utility hasn’t worked. Only 1% of UNI wallets increased their position post-airdrop. 98% never voted. Governance sounds good in theory. In practice? Just exit liquidity.
#3. Liquidity mining began with Synthetix in July 2019. The model quickly spread across DeFi. But governance didn’t sustain demand. 98% of airdrop recipients never participated. Most holders sold.
#4. Projects like Axie Infinity and Helium used multi-token models to separate speculation from utility. One token for value accrual, another for network use. But in both cases, the split didn’t hold. Speculators piled into the wrong token, incentives misaligned, and value fractured. Both reverted back to simplified models.
#5. Private funding exploded in 2021–2022. • 2021: $41.46B • 2022: $40.12B That’s more than 2x the entire 2017–2020 cycle combined. But this pattern hasn't been repeated since.
#7. In 2025, token launches are adjusting: • Circulating float has increased • Average FDV dropped from $5.5B → $1.94B Tokens that launched with higher float, lower FDV performed better post-listing. The market seems to be rewarding transparency and supply realism.
#8. Token buybacks are resurging. Protocols like @aave, @dYdX, @HyperliquidX , and @JupiterExchange have all launched structured burn programs using protocol revenue to buy and burn tokens from the market. A signal of financial strength, but also a stopgap for unresolved token utility.
#9. @HyperliquidX burned $8M+ in $HYPE, funded by 54% of trading fees. But no yield flows to token holders buybacks just support price. Critics argue buybacks = misallocated capital. Rather than rewarding holders, they induce artificial scarcity. Yield-bearing tokens would better align incentives.
#10. @believeapp is the emerging player in the ICM movement, allowing users to create tokens effortlessly on the Solana blockchain by posting on X with a specific format, such as ‘$TICKER + @launchcoin’, which triggers automatic token deployment via a bonding curve model.
#11. Despite all innovation, token utility remains unresolved. • Governance failed. • Buybacks are a crutch. • Points farming is short-term.
The 2021 meta: hype + low float The 2025 meta: revenue + redeemability PDF of the research↓
5,107
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。