Nobody is claiming that there is currently a massive swarm of high premium private order flow.
What we’re saying is that if you EXPAND the market for high fee paying private order flow (by moving standardness further from consensus), then you are basically guaranteed to increase the demand for a service such as Slipsteam.
This is very bad. Having 1 miner with privileged access to very high premium private order flow which has reliable demand from multiple popular and emerging applications undermines block producer incentives.
Why shouldn’t everyone just buy the slipstream powered template from Mara? Then Mara can build everyone’s templates for them.
What effect would that have on Bitcoin’s censorship resistant properties?
Now, in this particular case, that’s unlikely - copying slipstream and/or simply loosening the filters are each simple enough that it’s unlikely to see a “specialist MEV capture” scenario play out from this.
But if you guys do not sit down and actually have this conversation in an honest way fairly soon, it’s extremely likely that you could wind up in a specialist-inducing scenario. And you most certainly could see plenty of other undesirable consequences.
When you say “the point of filters is to make spam costly and cumbersome” YOU ARE LITERALLY BEGGING TO FORCE BITCOIN INTO SEVERE MEV REGIMES.
刚刚对 @oomahq 的帖子中提到的 OP_RETURN > 83 字节进行了些许调查（自从他的帖子发布后，很多人开始利用 OP_RETURN 来恶搞他）。
在大约 4 个月的时间内，有 30 笔这样的交易：
8 笔支付了合理的手续费（< 区块中位数的 2 倍）
11 笔支付了大约双倍手续费
7 笔支付了大约三倍手续费
4 笔支付了 5 倍至 8 倍手续费
其中 9 笔由 F2Pool 挖出（占 10-11%）
21 笔由 Mara 挖出（占 6-7%）
总体来看，OP_RETURN 筛选器的作用是使非标准交易平均支付比普通交易更高的费用以进入区块。而且由于只有大约 18% 的算力似乎在挖这些交易，它们需要等待 5-6 倍的时间才能确认。
如果筛选器的目的是让垃圾交易变得繁琐且成本高昂，我认为它们确实达到了目的。第一条评论中有交易 ID，您可以自行查看。
6,542
1
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。