was thinking about this again imagine if “native yield chains” like @blast didnt distribute yield 1:1 and instead only stakers got it you'd have a chain where: stables 4.5% -> 10% ETH 2.8% -> 6.4% all defi yields get pushed up to compete with these missed opportunity to ponzify the layer yield for those that dont know blast was staking all bridged stables into @SkyEcosystem sDAI @ 4.5% yield and all ETH into @LidoFinance stETH @ 2.8% yield and passing the yield onto anyone that held those assets on the chain * this fictional calculation assumes 44% of all the bridged assets actually get staked which is a completely random figure