Neobanks and RWAs will be the bubble of the next cycle. These consumer fintech app, due to branding power, think they can get away without PoR (see crypto[.]com)
They will race to the bottom with each taking increasing risks.
Another Difficult Personal Decision
Weâve made the difficult personal decisionâŠto stay miles away from every FAKE stablecoins out there and continue trading on @HyperliquidX, where we can literally reverse exposure in minutes with minimal market impact. đ€Ł
Not because @PacmanBlur, @SmokeyTheBera, or @pauliepuntâs exâbest friend đ€Łhave been calling this BS out â but because if most of your assets sit off-chain, you should NOT be called a stablecoin, and you definitely shouldnât be looping leverage on top of something that is illiquid by definition.
@pythianism called it âRWA loopingâ (conveniently aligned with @hiFrameworkâs latest investments â we understand itâs easy to sell LPs on a pivot to AI infra during AI-mania kek), but if Buffett called derivatives WMD back in 2008, then looping on illiquid assets with dubious transparency and spreads that clearly canât outlast on-chain borrow costs is just the tokenized version of WMD.
âž»
Why D2 Doesnât Touch That Stuff
At D2, we made very conservative design choices since December 2023, and we never marketed our stablecoin-deposit strategy as a âstablecoin.â
Even without a single down epoch (yet đđ), calling it that would have been misleading â thatâs exactly why we named it ETH++ and now HYPE++, so users wouldnât get confused.
Our triple-audited architecture guarantees that all users can withdraw at the same time, under the same conditions, during the withdrawal/deposit window:
This is why even @StreamDefi could withdraw their entire position in one transaction without affecting any other user.
(Receipts attached đ)
And â broken clock or not, right twice a day đ€Ł â Caleb invested in both d2HYPE and HYPE++, and made money in both.
âž»
With the Premise (as @GearboxProtocol correctly pointed out) That Looping is BrokenâŠCurious to See How Others Try to Fix It
Iâm genuinely curious how
@sonyasunkim, @3f_romeo, @3FLabs @MikeIppolito_
try to solve this fundamental mismatch, as they discussed on @thebellcurvepod:
But when your last hedge-fund employer is â the largest private lender in Asia with $50B AUM â forgive us for being skeptical that itâs âgoodâ to tokenize and loop leverage on private credit, or anything with the liquidity profile of private credit.
Private credit is a lawyers-and-paranoid-people game.
You negotiate covenants line-by-line, and you need a very specific skillset â the one my ex-colleagues at had.
That skillset is nothing like what Vance learned at Framework. Sorry, mate. VC is a home-run business.Private credit is precision-risk management.
And definitely completely different than the âskill setâ @Re7Labs @MEVCapital @hyperithm @TelosConsilium showed ( or lack of, kek)
âž»
And One Last Funny NoteâŠ
Sonia referenced @FasanaraDigital MF1as an example of illiquid private credit ( we like the flowcharts đ)
The stablecoin that Stream Finance used to repay the loan against MF1?
It came from their withdrawal of HYPE++ in one transaction, without any impact on other users.
So to anyone exposed to @StreamDefi: youâre welcome. đ
Hyperliquid

2,47Â k
1
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX nâest pas lâauteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit dâauteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă titre dâinformation uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions dâOKX. Il ne sâagit pas dâune approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation dâachat ou de vente dâactifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč lâIA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou dâautres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire lâarticle associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et dâinformations. OKX nâest pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques vous convient.


