⚡️ Fantom ( $FTM ) vs Harmony ( $ONE ): Sonic Speed vs Sharded Past Two Layer 1s with very different trajectories – one entering a new era, the other struggling to regain momentum. 📊 Market Overview $S (Sonic, Fantom) – Market Cap: $1.11B (#67), DeFi Protocols: 131, TVL: $1.124B $ONE – Market Cap: $179.69M (#249), DeFi Protocols: 61, TVL: $3.15M Sonic (Fantom): The high-performance, builder-first network Sonic is Fantom’s next evolution – claiming 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality. At its core is Fee Monetization (FeeM), a game-changing model that redirects up to 90% of dApp-generated fees back to developers. It’s a revenue layer that transforms network activity into builder incentives. The result? A highly scalable EVM-compatible L1 that aligns developer motivation with ecosystem growth. With over 130 active DeFi protocols, rapidly growing usage, and a monetization-first model, Sonic positions itself as a next-gen L1 that doesn’t just scale – it rewards. Best for: Developers seeking sustainable revenue Projects prioritizing UX and throughput DeFi builders looking for network traction + incentives Harmony (ONE): sharded but stalled Harmony pioneered state sharding and gained momentum in 2021, promising fast finality and scalable architecture. It implemented random state sharding to deliver near-instant blocks and cross-shard infrastructure. However, development has slowed significantly. Key innovations like cross-shard and cross-chain features remain largely theoretical. With a shrinking TVL, minimal user activity, and low developer engagement, Harmony now trails far behind more active L1s. Best for: Speculators hoping for a turnaround Those betting on legacy sharded designs Low-cap plays with asymmetric upside (and risk) 📈 Key Insights Sonic is emerging as a serious EVM contender, thanks to dev-first economics and unmatched performance claims. Harmony feels like a chain frozen in time, with once-promising features overshadowed by a lack of momentum. Which one aligns with your builder or investor thesis?