< into the chain bookmaker: the fourth bullet > the shipment perspective
Why do some people always lose money in the market, while others always make money?
✄ Black box operation/wash trading/flush out streategy
You are moving with the times, and the dealer is moving with the times
Want to see through this strategy? Today, I'm going to take you through every step of the way
Let's dive in
🧵

The difference between traditional stocks and onchain meme (regular army vs wild road)
✄ Because I am hungry, I go out to hunt, look at the strength and look at the luck, the strength is hungry if you can't touch the prey, and the luck can't catch the prey is also hungry
"Washing chips" is an authentic Chinese financial term, English is generally called shake out or flush out the weak to express, almost to clear the weak hand, although the expression is different, but the general meaning is the same.
Generally speaking, in the traditional stock market, there are many ways to obtain "chips" through offcial channels, such as early-stage investment/IPO purchase/secondary market purchase/various mergers and acquisitions/cross-shareholding, etc., these chips have fixed costs, and the costs revolve around the valuation or actual value of the project at different stages.
The means of manipulating the market are nothing more than these
1. Pump and dump
2. Whale Manipulation
3. Wash trading


By repeatedly shaking large amounts, flush out the weak, wash off the weak hands, and then draw a few patterns that are in line with the interests of the dealer (Figure 1 above is actually outdated)
Initial supply + market sentiment pulls to a position that the market maker/capital thinks is more appropriate, starts to reduce holdings, starts to reduce holdings within the framework, creates a shake out gap, and while lifting support, grid tradings dumps the goods, and pours them to retail investors at the right time

In another case, the channel rises or the shock rises, and the resistance level breaks through and then falls sharply, you think it is a head and shoulders top pattern, and it immediately changes into a channel rise, which is the flush out pattern of the variant
Many people advocate technical analysis (TA) For large cycles and large market capitalization targets, this kind of chip buying and selling is very intense, and fierce means that one company cannot control the market
Therefore, TA's technical analysis (i.e. K-line) is the final summary of all capital games, so your daily TA analysis is valid for BTC, but it is not suitable for high-control/solo investment plates

✄ Let me give you a few "rough" trading techniques
$1 is a few pure meme plates that appeared after the AI agent fever, and the trading method of this tour capital is very simple and crude, that is, the front of the car + caller + large multiple purchases

The main pull time of the first section is 4 a.m. on November 26, 24, and the specific method is foreign waist caller + with several addresses to buy a huge amount + robot push head KOL
Here we mainly look at his robot operation


Beginning on the 27th, meme bloggers in the middle waist began to discover this target and began to spontaneously bring people in, at that time the MC was already more than 50M, the top space was 100M, and the process only took 3 hours
At the same time, there are KOLs on the side of the push, almost 60M synchronous posting, at 9 pm on the 27th, $1 began to smash, and on the 28th, Daewoo sent a push to enter the price at noon The price has been retraced to 30M
Daewoo's tweet raised the price to 55M, and he ate 80% of the profits, assuming he ran away at that time


The second $1 market occurred on January 19-20, and the total rally period was 8 hours, because the cycle was far away, and the chip analysis was more laborious, so it was a simple analysis from the emotional side and FOMO call
The background of this wave of take-off was when $Trump was first released, and the direct reason was that Moonshot was the number one gainer
Still the same strategy
Conspiracy Puller + Waist Blogger + Quilt Retail + Push Robot (Robots are added 💵 after their names)
This wave of inheritance is all Chinese KOLs in my inductive timeline, and most of them were $trump FOMO calls, and the rest will not be analyzed
Summary: This kind of emotional disk is a habitual routine = mid-waist blogger + push robot + some TG group alpha FOMO call to complete the early price rise, the timing he chose is very good, generally one to two days after the start of the big hot market, the FOMO degree of the market is very high, and the hot money funds are easy to keep up


✄ Let's look at the second case, $IMG
The plate that just came out 5 days ago, this plate is relatively easy to judge, and the operation technique is more transparent and delicate
All secondary school funds are received and sent from the address ChGA1Wbh9WN8MDiQ4ggA5PzBspS2Z6QheyaxdVo3XdW6
-> So let's start with the perspective of retail analysis!

The funds of the pull plate are sent to 100+ trumpets through the secondary school address ChGA1Wbh9WN8MDiQ4ggA5PzBspS2Z6QheyaxdVo3XdW6, and the amount of the pull plate is all small (it should be the script to run)
As you can see from the bubblemap, ChGA1Wbh9WN8MDiQ4ggA5PzBspS2Z6QheyaxdVo3XdW6 has a stack close to 50 (it used to be higher)
Since I don't know the banker's initial stack ratio, I'll take a look at how much money he's making so far

从Solscan上拉出所有大于 > 1 的SOL inflow转账记录,那么可以得知其inflow实打实的大概有960K
似乎是从一个地址中transfer过来的,合理的猜测可能是一个program,大家也可以做一个调查看看(7dENTXoCuroeDTVhPnHLErnkvUVxydeShcz7oqE6r3uD)


Outflow I also pulled a table, the filter selection is also greater than 1SOL before it is counted, the outflow here is about 339K, about the estimate of net pofit in 621K, this dealer still has nearly 50% of the chips not out


Then continue to dig deep into the initial SOL balance of this banker, 5 days ago, his address has a balance close to 182 SOL, and the address balance here has been changing, most likely for several reasons
1) Secondary school address balance change — Indicates that the semicolon at the beginning is given to the initial SOL
2 Changes in the balance of the secondary school address +, some small addresses have begun to be realized, and then call back to the secondary school address
3) The balance of the secondary school address changes +, and the small number of chips to buy is not enough, so transfer more chips from elsewhere to buy
From retail investors, the analysis basically stops here


✄ So what's the dealer's perspective?
My initial capital graduated from pumpfun, here I can choose 60-70% of the second to let retail investors push the waves to the external market in the inner market, or I can choose to go directly to the external market in seconds
So at this time, my cost (it can be 70% initial buy, spend 70-90SOL, plus 30% after it comes out through the trumpet seconds, this part of the cost cannot be estimated, depending on whether there are retail investors/bots following up with the block) So the approximate cost can be controlled within 200SOL
That is to say, your chips are controlled at 200SOL, according to what we said in the second round, the pulling capital is directly proportional to the market value of the MC, 40-600,000 US dollars is easy to do when the market is good, 10-30x MC can easily do it, when the market is bad, the market is not good!
So according to expectations, we make a cost statistics, 70% of the chips are controlled within 150SOL, the angle is positive + the market is good, 300,000 US dollars of pulling funds + 150SOL = close to 10 million - 30 million market value MC plates
Does the dealer need to shuffle/draw chips? There is no need for the chain at all, the talent is the key, there is no such thing as a chip, and the next one will be done after this plate is played!
I'm a little tired of writing, so for the time being, the fourth bullet will be like this first
I hope that in 2025, everyone can handle the plate well, and I will bless you with peppercorns

strategy* some typo

152.86K
343
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.