Horse on Ketamine price

😴 Before bed, I thought about the token structure of $KET and why it has more extensibility than most meme projects. From the results, $KET is the least typical meme in recent times: it doesn't have a continuous explosive growth period, but it does have a long tail of a stable rising price curve. To explain this phenomenon, we can't just say "there's a mechanism"; we need to start from the three core economic logics: supply, release rhythm, and use cases. 1. Token Distribution The total supply of $KET is 1 billion tokens, which is not a small number, but the structural division is very restrained. The official team has never heavily promoted this distribution, but on-chain tracking shows: 🔸 The liquidity pool + initial market distribution accounts for about 25%, which is enough to support depth and not be "thin enough to be manipulated." 🔸 The community incentive pool + eKET reward release accounts for about 30%, which is currently the most active part. 🔸 The team/advisors/contributors have about 20% locked, but there is a 24-month linear release + cliff (lock-up period). 🔸 The remaining approximately 25% is reserved for future buybacks, strategic partnerships, NFT interactions, and other uses. The key point is: there are no VC private placements, and no massive airdrops that could crash the market. Among the current 1 billion in circulation, the portion that can actually enter CEX and DEX for frequent trading is very small; the vast majority of the circulation is actually locked in behavior-binding mechanisms and interaction structures. This means: market selling pressure is predictable but won't be sudden; the chip structure is visible but not concentrated. 2. Release Mechanism Many projects fall into a dead end because they rely on airdrops to attract new users and unlocks for early users, resulting in new users not being able to obtain meaningful positions while old users wait for exit windows. $KET solves this problem by: eKET mapping structure: initially obtaining points through behavior, then uniformly claiming $KET quarterly; Each mapping cycle sets a "time + activity" dual-factor threshold, forming a cleansing mechanism; The truly circulating airdrop releases in the market without behavior binding are very rare. This brings two benefits: 🔸 Early community members must remain active to unlock tokens. 🔸 Airdrop recipients cannot directly crash the market because there is no "immediate cash-out" channel. It effectively uses a slow release + continuous behavior proof structure to kick out users who "take and leave." 3. Use Cases and Destruction Logic Many projects talk about deflation, but $KET's deflation is tied to use cases, not abstract destruction. Its three-layer use case logic is as follows: ① Behavior Binding: All community governance and ecological interactions require wallet holders to possess a certain amount of $KET. Voting weight will further be tied to NFT and orb point levels. Under this mechanism, $KET is not just a voting ticket but a "participation right" token. ② Fee Buyback + Automatic Destruction: Every on-chain operation incurs a small fee, automatically triggering a 0.3% destruction mechanism. This is not a "potential future execution"; it is already written into the contract and runs at any time. ③ Revenue Buyback: @YellowCatDAO officially revealed in the TG group that 20% of the revenue from ecological products (AI bots, NFT platforms, etc.) will be regularly used for secondary market buybacks and enter the destruction pool. This forms a feedback loop of "as ecological use grows, destruction also grows." This is not simply "burning coins to hype up," but integrating destruction behavior into the entire ecological revenue distribution. 4. Future Structural Continuation From the current development, $KET is likely to become an identity asset. Based on current community governance behavior: NFTs may bind voting rights, proposal rights, and ecological whitelist channels. The orb score + KET holdings + NFT form a trinity user profile system. Future GameFi, content platforms, and even cross-chain bridge usage rights will extend from this. This is different from SHIBA's past reliance on meme hype + Shibaswap ecology to drive up prices. $KET's path is closer to "on-chain behavior -> data layer -> identity binding -> rights distribution." This is actually a gap in the application ecology on the @AVAX chain. If it fills the gap in the NFT + DAO direction, the role of the entire token will upgrade from "voting certificate" to "ecological passport" in the future. In summary: The token model of #KET is not about making you guess when it will hype, but about making it clear: when to participate, what to do, and what you can exchange for after doing it. In this structure, "price increase" is just a byproduct of the structure being validated.

"The hidden big move of Ket that everyone ignores, NFTs are about to be issued!" In the crypto world, some projects quickly rise to trending topics and then fade into silence; while others, from the very beginning, are not chasing hype but are laying a long-term foundation around their underlying structure. $KET is more like the latter. Ket proves with real actions that memes are not the end, but just the beginning. Many people have overlooked the NFTs that may be issued next 🪂 › ••••••••• ‹ Why are NFTs key, and not just "another round of assets"? In the past, many projects issued NFTs after launching their tokens, mostly to "sell images + hype scarcity." But for Ket, this batch of upcoming NFTs is not just for another round of monetization, but to complete its on-chain identity system and incentive stratification mechanism. Founder @nobsfud has hinted multiple times recently that they are building identity-related modules. Combined with the existing interactive data structure and governance model, these NFTs are likely to serve the following purposes: 🔸 Bind behavior records: Holding a certain type of interactive NFT means you have a real on-chain participation history. 🔸 Change permission structure: Specific NFTs lower proposal thresholds and increase governance weight. 🔸 Identity level weighting: After binding behavior + holdings, user identity levels can be elevated, granting access to more resource priority pools. You can think of this as an "on-chain passport" in the web3 world, not just collectibles or avatars. 🟡 Behind this mechanism, it actually connects "power" and "behavior" through NFTs and $KET. 🔶 Core: Organizing a community system with a long-tail incentive structure based on tokens. @yellowcatdao's model design skips the traditional meme project path of "relying on hype to support market value, relying on trends to explain concepts," and instead starts deploying structural functional components from the very early stages of the community. On-chain points system Orb: A way to map interactive behaviors as on-chain identity traces. It is directly linked to governance rights, NFT rewards, and future dividend pools; it's not enough to just claim you are an "old user." Community governance: The Snapshot model is in use, but more importantly, holding #KET alone is not enough to influence decisions; holders need to participate, interact, and execute. This truly makes "participation" a part of the asset. Under this series of mechanisms, KET is doing something not so "emotional"—building a complete self-operating community incentive system that transforms on-chain behavior data into the underlying fuel for organizational autonomy. @yellowcatdao's special position in the @avax ecosystem. Avalanche is one of the few public chains that currently finds a relative balance between efficiency, stability, and developer friendliness, and among its meme and cultural projects, $KET is one of the most complete in terms of mechanisms. Most meme coins tend to direct users towards trading from the very beginning; however, KET's path has been closer to "behavioral structure building" from the start: you are here to participate, not to cash out. What you gain is not "dividend eligibility," but a ticket to "whether you can continue to participate." If it really introduces on-chain identity, cross-chain mapping, GameFi interactions, or NFT stratified governance in the future, its operation will increasingly resemble a self-organizing platform product. In summary: If KET issues NFTs in the future, it will definitely be a significant length of participation. Because NFTs are the last piece of the puzzle for Ket's gameplay, their value is absolutely not low! Finally, #cookie @cookiedotfun ends in 2 days, I made a mistake earlier 😭 @neko18666 @0xyi666 @hanhanbtc @btcfuyao @lijiaoshou12 @dakuan_x @xiaomolianyou @crypto_azh @0xsmall_ Big names on the list~

Which of these memes will go to $1B first? 🐶 1. $AURA 2. $TIBBIR 3. $MOG 4. $REKT 5. $KET 6. $LAMBO 7. $NPC 8. $DOG 9. $NEIRO 10. $PNUT

Good morning, #Ket, there's only one day left, persistence is victory. The leaderboard only shows 25 people, and it's completely heated up! But don't be discouraged, this time at least 100 people will be covered, possibly up to 300, as hinted by the founder's vote on Tuesday! Everyone, make a final push on the last day, post your #ket tweets in the comments, and I will support each one of you! No one knows who will be in the top 100, but you must believe in miracles! › ••••••••• ‹ @yellowcatdao comprehensive introduction On the #Avalanche chain, $KET is a special existence. It is not the opposite of a meme, nor does it claim to be an authoritative functional financial asset. It is attempting to build a "behavior-driven community system with feedback mechanisms," using the most basic DeFi tools, the lightest NFT system, and the most restrained governance logic to form a sufficiently self-consistent economic closed loop @nobsfud. Breaking down the project mechanism: Tokens as anchor points. $KET is not a distribution certificate that "loses effectiveness after incentives." It binds on-chain identity, connecting multiple entry points such as staking rewards, points generation, NFT unlocking, and community governance, serving as a unified interface for multiple behavioral paths. This is to make the token a structural tool rather than just a chip. The Orb system provides a delay mechanism for participation and feedback. Traditional incentives either distribute instantly or rely entirely on ranking mechanisms, which cannot support medium-term expectations. The Orb, however, acts like a point system that continuously accumulates "participation temperature." The emphasis behind this system design is not on the amount of participation, but on the signal density of "valuable behaviors." NFTs are identity layers rather than decorative avatars. In the context of #KET, NFTs are carriers of community members' behavioral traces, expected to bind reputation points, Orb accumulation, and task completion in the future, becoming an on-chain Passport for Web3. This is not a traditional PFP, but a user front-end expression of structured data at the DAO level. DAO governance is an information processing structure, not a voting ritual. @yellowcatdao's governance does not pursue high-frequency decision-making but exists as a resource allocation mechanism. Snapshot leaves a "communication channel" for the community, but what truly takes effect is whether proposals can connect to actual behavioral nodes. This type of DAO is more like a management panel for an automated strategy system rather than a democratic voting ritual. KET does not emphasize "narrative," but rather "structural stability." You rarely see @yellowcatdao promoting so-called narratives in a grand manner. It resembles an organization oriented towards technical experimentation, validating whether the on-chain behavior mapping mechanism can continuously operate with extremely low costs and noise. There is no massive financing, no "AI web3 track" label, only continuously iterating interaction paths and a clear community feedback model. This design style is very counterintuitive. It does not create narrative-driven content but directly builds systems. You might think it lacks stories and highlights, but precisely because it has no nonsense, it runs extremely cleanly. Compared to Doge's "emotional flow leverage" and SHIB's ecological hard bundling structure, $KET seems to be attempting to create a cold start model that connects on-chain behavioral incentive logic, DAO decision-making logic, and NFT identity logic for meme-based assets. It is not yet fully formed, but each of its components is moving towards one goal: to generate data from on-chain behavior and let the data drive incentives and participation in return. The high performance and low cost on the Avalanche chain provide ideal soil for this "intensive interaction + frequent feedback" design style.

【Ket accumulates and bursts forth, I see the shadow of Shib on the Yellow Cat】 The Ket leaderboard ends in 2 days, and with a wave of the hand, another 50,000 airdrops are given out in a week. Which meme has been continuously built upon for the past six months?! Thanks to Cookie for letting us recognize the best meme on the #avax chain 🐱 $KET has suddenly become popular in the circle, not because someone is promoting it or pushing sales, nor is it a short-term hype driven by meme emotions. At first glance, it doesn't seem very attractive. But once you delve deeper, you'll find that it combines technical logic with community culture, unlike many projects that change chains frequently. Deployed on @avax, @YellowCatDAO looks like a traditional DAO, but its core is quite fresh—it’s not the kind of DAO where "everyone has one vote and then boring governance"; instead, it has a clear mechanism design: AI smart trading tools, on-chain identity systems, behavior data scoring, and a bunch of community creations featuring anime cats, making it quite systematic. $KET is the main axis of the entire ecosystem, not just a governance token, but also participates in the incentive mechanism. The official statement says that using it in conjunction with their AI tools can improve trading success rates. Although specific numbers cannot be verified, at least the logic holds. Moreover, it’s not like Doge or SHIBA, which rely on a single phrase to soar and then crash the next second. SHIB has been building its ecosystem for two years, and many people still don’t understand what it’s really about. But the direction of Yellow Cat is quite clear: data-driven + community accumulation, not relying on performance but on behavior mapping and data value. @cookiedotfun's recent system of "on-chain behavior as assets" aligns with @yellowcatdao, forming a positive cycle: user interaction, data becoming assets, AI empowering models, and then feeding back into the community. This model doesn’t rely on luck or celebrities; it’s a slow but steady path. Just like early SHIB, when everyone treated it as a meme, it quietly built a complete on-chain infrastructure. And $KET may be following a similar path—not creating myths about coin prices, but laying the foundation for on-chain recognition. Recently, several key movements have circulated in the community: an NFT avatar system, rare badges, and an on-chain identity identification mechanism centered around data value. Although there’s no official confirmation, several tweets from @nobsfud, the localization creation plan from the @Cookiedotfun community, and that "Creator Economy White Paper" are gradually piecing together this outline. This means that in the future, $KET users are likely to have a set of identity systems tied to on-chain behavior—like a passport in the Web3 era. The more seriously one participates, the more complete their records, the rarer their NFTs, and the stronger their influence. So you can continue to observe, but also know that true value distribution doesn’t come from shouting orders; it’s those who leave "structured traces" on-chain that will benefit.